<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Do Not Reply</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.donotreply.com</link>
	<description>They Told You Not To Reply</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 03:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Scary Week Ends - The Department of Homeland Security by They told you not to reply &#124; Grobstein</title>
		<link>http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/02/16/scary-week-ends-the-department-of-homeland-security/#comment-9885</link>
		<dc:creator>They told you not to reply &#124; Grobstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/02/16/scary-week-ends-the-department-of-homeland-security/#comment-9885</guid>
		<description>[...] sent to addresses @donotreply.com. Lots of private, secret information gets to them this way. The post about DHS is probably the single best, but of course it&#8217;s the cumulative effect of all the diverse [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] sent to addresses @donotreply.com. Lots of private, secret information gets to them this way. The post about DHS is probably the single best, but of course it&#8217;s the cumulative effect of all the diverse [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dear Kellogg Brown &#038; Root (Halliburton) by Who is Chet Faliszek?</title>
		<link>http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/02/10/dear-kellogg-brown-root-halliburton/#comment-9121</link>
		<dc:creator>Who is Chet Faliszek?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/02/10/dear-kellogg-brown-root-halliburton/#comment-9121</guid>
		<description>[...] illustre Namen wie „The Department of Homeland Security&#8221;, &#8220;Merrill Lynch&#8221; oder „Halliburton&#8221;. Und da Chet scheinbar Zeit und Muse hat, veröffentlicht er einige der herausragende Mails auf die [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] illustre Namen wie „The Department of Homeland Security&#8221;, &#8220;Merrill Lynch&#8221; oder „Halliburton&#8221;. Und da Chet scheinbar Zeit und Muse hat, veröffentlicht er einige der herausragende Mails auf die [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Questions, Questions, Questions by sam metal</title>
		<link>http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/03/22/questions-questions-questions/#comment-9114</link>
		<dc:creator>sam metal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/03/22/questions-questions-questions/#comment-9114</guid>
		<description>Update!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scary Week Ends - The Department of Homeland Security by Who is Chet Faliszek?</title>
		<link>http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/02/16/scary-week-ends-the-department-of-homeland-security/#comment-9098</link>
		<dc:creator>Who is Chet Faliszek?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/02/16/scary-week-ends-the-department-of-homeland-security/#comment-9098</guid>
		<description>[...] und wer alles so antwortet, illustre Namen wie „The Department of Homeland Security&#8221;, &#8220;Merrill Lynch&#8221; oder „Halliburton&#8221;. Und da Chet scheinbar Zeit und Muse hat, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] und wer alles so antwortet, illustre Namen wie „The Department of Homeland Security&#8221;, &#8220;Merrill Lynch&#8221; oder „Halliburton&#8221;. Und da Chet scheinbar Zeit und Muse hat, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Questions, Questions, Questions by Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/03/22/questions-questions-questions/#comment-9070</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/03/22/questions-questions-questions/#comment-9070</guid>
		<description>I wonder what the implications would be of anti-spam legislation within the context of such unwanted emails? And yes, I'd second the request for a script that just posts stats on evil emailer domains ...

Do you get emails in languages other than English as well? That might highlight flaws in default software configurations, perhaps ...

Does your wildcard email thing also work with other subdomains? E.g. if it was company.donotreply.com, would you receive it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what the implications would be of anti-spam legislation within the context of such unwanted emails? And yes, I&#8217;d second the request for a script that just posts stats on evil emailer domains &#8230;</p>
<p>Do you get emails in languages other than English as well? That might highlight flaws in default software configurations, perhaps &#8230;</p>
<p>Does your wildcard email thing also work with other subdomains? E.g. if it was company.donotreply.com, would you receive it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Capital One - What&#8217;s in your return address field? by BimmerBEN335i</title>
		<link>http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/02/10/capital-one-whats-in-your-return-address-field/#comment-9046</link>
		<dc:creator>BimmerBEN335i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/02/10/capital-one-whats-in-your-return-address-field/#comment-9046</guid>
		<description>Oh men, I am reading all this and it's quite clueless as to how people read emails, it clearly shows that people do not read emails, if you read the email carefully it clearly states "THIS IS FOR YOUR INFORMATION" that if you have any concerns of this transaction to please contact the "800 number below of the letter" that email never state the fact that you need to "REPLY" man i tell ya, "READ YOUR EMAILS" HELLO!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh men, I am reading all this and it&#8217;s quite clueless as to how people read emails, it clearly shows that people do not read emails, if you read the email carefully it clearly states &#8220;THIS IS FOR YOUR INFORMATION&#8221; that if you have any concerns of this transaction to please contact the &#8220;800 number below of the letter&#8221; that email never state the fact that you need to &#8220;REPLY&#8221; man i tell ya, &#8220;READ YOUR EMAILS&#8221; HELLO!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scary Week Ends - The Department of Homeland Security by BelchSpeak &#187; Post Topic &#187; Sending Email From DoNotReply.Com</title>
		<link>http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/02/16/scary-week-ends-the-department-of-homeland-security/#comment-8989</link>
		<dc:creator>BelchSpeak &#187; Post Topic &#187; Sending Email From DoNotReply.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/02/16/scary-week-ends-the-department-of-homeland-security/#comment-8989</guid>
		<description>[...] You have probably seen some official emails come from your company or company you do business with, using the domain of &#8220;donotreply.com&#8221; as their email address since the mailbox is unattended. Or maybe the people sending the email have no interest in getting any response. So what happens if you actually reply to one of those emails? It goes to this guy who actually owns the domain. So far he has seen thousands of scary emails detailing the internal workings of companies and even some national security groups like the TSA and DHS. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] You have probably seen some official emails come from your company or company you do business with, using the domain of &#8220;donotreply.com&#8221; as their email address since the mailbox is unattended. Or maybe the people sending the email have no interest in getting any response. So what happens if you actually reply to one of those emails? It goes to this guy who actually owns the domain. So far he has seen thousands of scary emails detailing the internal workings of companies and even some national security groups like the TSA and DHS. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scary Week Ends - The Department of Homeland Security by jrpatton</title>
		<link>http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/02/16/scary-week-ends-the-department-of-homeland-security/#comment-8936</link>
		<dc:creator>jrpatton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/02/16/scary-week-ends-the-department-of-homeland-security/#comment-8936</guid>
		<description>"He added that another e-mail he received was about US "military procedures and tactics".
 
"It had the notice 'Destroy by any means to prevent capture'," he said."

@scooter: Military policy and what actually happens are two different things. At one place and time it seems good to have a policy that says "no sensitive info on the net". At another it just seems so convenient to email those sensitive docs instead of mailing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He added that another e-mail he received was about US &#8220;military procedures and tactics&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;It had the notice &#8216;Destroy by any means to prevent capture&#8217;,&#8221; he said.&#8221;</p>
<p>@scooter: Military policy and what actually happens are two different things. At one place and time it seems good to have a policy that says &#8220;no sensitive info on the net&#8221;. At another it just seems so convenient to email those sensitive docs instead of mailing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Questions, Questions, Questions by jrpatton</title>
		<link>http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/03/22/questions-questions-questions/#comment-8935</link>
		<dc:creator>jrpatton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/03/22/questions-questions-questions/#comment-8935</guid>
		<description>I don't suppose you could counter-sue a few of these companies if you let them actually follow through with a lawsuit threat? Maybe that'll actually teach them a lesson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t suppose you could counter-sue a few of these companies if you let them actually follow through with a lawsuit threat? Maybe that&#8217;ll actually teach them a lesson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Questions, Questions, Questions by jasonn</title>
		<link>http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/03/22/questions-questions-questions/#comment-8782</link>
		<dc:creator>jasonn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.donotreply.com/index.php/2008/03/22/questions-questions-questions/#comment-8782</guid>
		<description>Awesome - better you than me explaining to corporate types why they're doing dumb things with their email.

Corporate email philosophy seems to be: do the most damaging and ridiculously stupid thing, then accuse anyone that brings it to your attention of criminal behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome - better you than me explaining to corporate types why they&#8217;re doing dumb things with their email.</p>
<p>Corporate email philosophy seems to be: do the most damaging and ridiculously stupid thing, then accuse anyone that brings it to your attention of criminal behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
